Other reports

Praxis

Praxis

"When I went to see a doctor last winter, I entered the doctor’s office and she told me that I didn’t need to come since she could see that I was not ill, although I really was ill. She didn’t even examine me and I didn’t complain to anyone.” (F, YOB 2000, Bor)

“In most institutions, employees are more unfriendly to Roma, even though they do not say it is the reason.” (F, YOB 1988, Prokuplje) 

 “In Pristina, I lived in a Roma mahala and children from the mahala mainly did not go to school. I don’t know why, simply it was so that children did not attend school, but they had to work. I looked after my siblings, and children of close relatives, while the adults were working.” (F, YOB 1969, Leskovac) 

“My parents thought that female children should not go to school; they were expected to look after younger siblings and do housework. They did not enrol me in school so that I wouldn’t be spoiled.” (F, YOB 1982, Bor)

How easily or how carelessly do we access our rights? How much and in what way do we become aware of our rights or the lack of them? What is multiple discrimination and how it affects the exercise of human rights? How easy is it to access „rights guaranteed by birth“ at the crossroad of gender, racial and structural discrimination?

Even though “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights“, the credibility of the words from the Universal Declaration or legal acts of the Republic of Serbia guaranteeing equal rights to all citizens, may be best assessed by those to whom these rights, though guaranteed and universal in the paper, are inaccessible, denied and often unknown in everyday life.

It seems to us that rights are not guaranteed and granted at birth. We exercise the rights within the state system, as members of a political community, as political subjects. However, the persons who do not have evidence on their birth, citizenship and do not possess personal documents, are legally invisible. In Serbia, those are mostly Roma, who daily encounter numerous impediments to exercise of the rights.

We exercise the rights as social subjects, and equal participants in society. If we are discriminated by the society we live in, the exercise of the rights guaranteed by the law and thus available to us as equal citizens of certain country, becomes impeded by discriminatory social practices. We exercise rights or are deprived of them, in a daily interaction with the other members of society. 

We exercise the rights also within an immediate community, a family. The exercise of rights for the Roma women, who live and grow up in dominantly patriarchal social environment, with clearly defined gender roles which women keep in the private sphere, is additionally impeded. 

We gain awareness about the rights through education and the availability of information. Without the information and awareness about their rights, Roma women are in an extremely vulnerable position. Even when they possess personal documents, decision on their lives are often reached by their husbands or parents. If their personal choices are not in line with the imposed ones, the unavailability of information on who they may address for support and the lack of appropriate infrastructure for the implementation of support expose them to multiples discrimination and vulnerability. Their access to rights is then blocked from all sides. 

We exercise the rights through economic independence. 

Research on access to socio-economic rights for Roma women in Serbia, which we conducted in 2015, with the support of Civil Rights Defenders, in 10 municipalities in the south of Serbia, gave the following findings:

• the right to social protection is exercised by 38% of women who are right holders; 27% of women responded that their spouses/common-law partners were holders of the rights to social protection, while the same answer was given by only 7% of men;

• 31% of female respondents completed elementary school, 17% of female respondents have never attended school, a total of 39% female respondents said that they had been enrolled in elementary school, but had not completed yet; only 4% of female respondents have completed secondary school.

• out of 100 surveyed Roma women, 35% of them confirmed that they have received some income; 54% of surveyed Roma women have never applied for a job, and as many as 100% of women gave this response in Kursumlija, while in Leskovac and Prokuplje 90% of female respondents answered this way;

• 92% of female respondents live in dilapidated facilities made of brick, 88% live in the facilities that have electricity, 72% have access to drinking water, while 45% live in the facilities that are not connected to the sewage network;

• the most common reason for not exercising social protection rights and not possessing a health booklet is the is the lack of necessary documents; poverty is the major cause of non-enrolment or termination of elementary education.

Within European Action Week Against Racism, we want to point at social, legal and political barriers encountered by a large number of Roma women in everyday life on their way towards the exercise of rights – as members of a discriminated minority community, as women within highly patriarchal system, as legally invisible and without the voting right, both inside and outside their community.

 

What is hate crime? Why is it important to make clear distinction between hate crime and other crimes? What is the role of the local community in fight against hate crime?

In the period from 22 December 2015 to 26 February 2016, Praxis visited Valjevo, Nis, Kraljevo, Sabac and Pancevo and organized a series of trainings named Hate crime in Serbia.

The trainings gathered 40 participants – representatives of NGO sector, social welfare centres, police and courts – and opened a number of discussions about the problems faced by victims of hate crime, criminal procedures conducted for hate oriented attacks, role of local community in fight against hate crime and importance of registering such cases.

What should we know?

  • hate crime is a criminal act motivated by hatred towards someone just because he/she is different!

  • hate crime was introduced in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia in 2012, but it is inherent to society and there are many examples of hate crime throughout the history: suffering of Jews, Roma and the Slavs during the Second World War, violence against African-Americans in the USA in the middle of the last century, the genocide in Rwanda and other crimes

  • hate crime is not caused by acting of a victim, but its innate qualities, or personal characteristics, such as national or ethnic origin, colour of skin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity

  • psychological and physical violence occurs as a result of intolerance and hatred

  • any of us may be a victim of hate crime and we all have traits that make us different from others

Why is it important to talk about hate crime?

  • hate crime is a crime of high social risk, also called a message crime by some; by attacking an individual, a perpetrator also attacks the whole group to which the individual belongs, and sends a message to all members of the group that they are not safe or welcome

  • responsibilities of state institutions, but also the responsibilities of the society and individuals are to encourage tolerance, instead of hate messages to send messages of understanding and support, through exploring and understanding the other and different to say NO to stereotypes and prejudices and thus prevent the occurrence of hate crimes  

  • the task of state institutions is that if such criminal act occurs, there is an appropriate reaction meaning that the criminal act is adequately processed and registered and perpetrator properly punished 

March 21, The International Day for Elimination of Racial Discrimination is approaching. On that occasion, UNITED Intercultural Action every year coordinates the activities performed during European Action Week Against Racism, when the organization across Europe, following the principle of equality for all, initiate numerous activities with the united attitude and messages against racism, fascism, discrimination and intolerance.
 
How do we fight against racism, discrimination and intolerance while we are witnessing closing of borders, catastrophic and mostly helpless situations in which refugees and asylum seekers find themselves, xenophobic reactions, racist motivated acts of violence, hate speech, segregation of Roma children in schools, open intolerance and attacks on members of LGBT community?

During European Action Week Against Racism, we will present to you a range of information and stories we come across in our everyday work. In this way, we want to point at the urgent need for actions, open and loud protests against social injustice and disrespect for human rights, but also at the ways in which we can, individually or collectively, step up and say NO to racism, intolerance and discrimination.

At the session held on 3 March, the Government of Serbia adopted the Strategy for the Social Inclusion of Roma in the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2016-2025. According to the announcement of the Ministry of Labor, Employment, Veteran and Social Affairs, this strategic document should enhance and improve the work of institutions dealing with issues of social inclusion and combating discrimination against Roma over a period of 9 years, and provide conditions for the achievement of full access to human rights for people of Roma nationality.

Having in mind that the envisaged measures and activities carried out under the auspices of the previous Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma in the Republic of Serbia 2009-2015 in many segments have failed to contribute to the substantial improvement of the situation of the members of Roma community, the new Strategy arose from the need to improve the issues in a systematic and comprehensive manner and envisage more adequate measures of social inclusion of Roma, both at national and local level. This strategic document covers five priority areas - education, housing, employment, health and social protection.

Wanting with constructive comments that reflect experiences from practice to contribute to the quality of this document, and thus to improvement to the position of Roma, Praxis participated in the process of drafting the Strategy. In addition to the specific comments pertaining to different segments of the five priority areas and proposals for a more precise definition of individual measures,  Praxis’ general observation referred to the lack of the text of the Action Plan. Respecting the commitment of the competent authorities to continue the work on promotion of the social inclusion of Roma, Praxis takes this opportunity to once again draw attention to the need for the measures provided for by the Strategy to be, as soon as possible, operationalized by the adoption of the Action Plan because only then the first and necessary precondition towards the achievement of the proclaimed goals will be fulfilled.

Praxis took part in a discussion within the international youth training „A MILE IN MY SHOES: tools for fighting discrimination and building more inclusive society“, taking place in Belgrade from 5-14 March, organized through cooperation of Portuguese NGO Agora Aveiro and Serbian NGO Klub Putnika, and financed by Erasmus+.

The training gathered around 20 young people coming from Serbia, Greece, Macedonia, Hungary and Portugal, with the aim to build up the knowledge and offer various perspectives on one of the biggest crisis of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers since the World War Two. Furthermore, at the same time the purpose of the training has been to motivate and encourage young participants to come up with different ideas and tools for actions which would foster social inclusion and promote anti-discriminatory values.

During the discussion, we shared some of our experiences acquired through the field work related to refugees’ and asylum seekers’ protection and basic humanitarian assistance. If you would like to better understand the concept of “a mile in my shoes” and get a closer insight into the experiences of the refugees, migrants and asylum seekers, you are welcome to join the final part of the training, a public event called “A Living Library” which will take place in KC Grad on Saturday, 12 March, from 16h to 18h.

Praxis took part in a discussion within the international youth training „A MILE IN MY SHOES: tools for fighting discrimination and building more inclusive society“, taking place in Belgrade from 5-14 March, organized through cooperation of Portuguese NGO Agora Aveiro and Serbian NGO Klub Putnika, and financed by Erasmus+.

The training gathered around 20 young people coming from Serbia, Greece, Macedonia, Hungary and Portugal, with the aim to build up the knowledge and offer various perspectives on one of the biggest crisis of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers since the World War Two. Furthermore, at the same time the purpose of the training has been to motivate and encourage young participants to come up with different ideas and tools for actions which would foster social inclusion and promote anti-discriminatory values.

During the discussion, we shared some of our experiences acquired through the field work related to refugees’ and asylum seekers’ protection and basic humanitarian assistance. If you would like to better understand the concept of “a mile in my shoes” and get a closer insight into the experiences of the refugees, migrants and asylum seekers, you are welcome to join the final part of the training, a public event called “A Living Library” which will take place in KC Grad on Saturday, 12 March, from 16h to 18h.

The United Nations (UN) declared 8 March the International Women's Day in 1975. Since then, UN has been marking this day with a special theme. So, this year’s global initiative and action “Planet 50-50 by 2030”, under the auspices of the UN, calls for joining the efforts of world leaders and decision-makers to do everything to improve the status of women by 2030 through the implementation of objectives that include achieving gender equality and empowerment of women and girls around the world, and provision of an inclusive and quality education for all and promotion of lifelong learning. 

Achieving these goals requires the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, ending any form of violence against women and girls (including human trafficking, sexual and any other exploitation of women and girls), as well as the elimination of many other unacceptable practices such as child, early and forced marriages and female genital mutilation.

However, what is more important to emphasize, achieving these goals requires initiatives that go beyond the traditional 8 March discourse and which involve action both in the public and the private sphere.

During 2016, Praxis contributes to the achievement of these objectives through the implementation of a number of activities aimed at the prevention and elimination of child, early and forced marriages, and protection of children and women refugees, bearing in mind that their specific situation requires a significant number of gender-sensitive services and protection mechanisms.

In reference to the struggle for personal and human rights of women throughout history, and with an intention that 8 March spirit remains recognizable for the fighting spirit and fearlessness of women, we represent to you the story of incredible Nawal Soufi.

Read the story: Meet the One-Woman Syrian Rescue Mission

Almost 5% of Roma children born in Serbia are unable to secure a birth certificate, leaving them at risk of statelessness.  If they are never registered, they will be excluded from accessing education, social insurance and healthcare. They might never be able to marry officially and they increase the risk that their own children will be stateless.

Human rights organisations started legal proceedings today in Serbia’s Constitutional Court to take away register offices’ unlimited power to deny birth certificates to children born in the country. The organisations behind the legal challenge hope this will finally stop register offices from denying Roma birth certificates for their children, which leaves them legally invisible and at risk of statelessness.

The European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) and Praxis, supported by the European Network on Statelessness, lodged a constitutional initiative to the Constitutional Court arguing that Serbia’s law on registers allows officials to deprive children of their right to a name and a legal identity by giving them legal cover for refusing to issue birth certificates. The law in question is a vaguely-worded provision that says registrars can delay registering the birth of a child in order to verify the information on the register. The law is contrary to the internationally recognised human right of every child to be registered immediately after birth. Under the constitutional initiative procedure, non-governmental organisations can challenge a provision of legislation as being unconstitutional.

“Serbian law gives registrars too much power, and they are using it to deprive Roma children of their internationally recognised right to get a birth certificate immediately. Today, we’re calling for the Constitutional Court to put an end to it”, said Dorde Jovanovic, the ERRC’s President.

Praxis, a Serbia-based NGO, has been providing legal aid to families who are victims of this rule for many years, helping them secure documents. Praxis has also been working with government and UNHCR to find solutions to the problem. Their first success was introducing a new kind of court proceeding that allows people whose birth was unregistered to get registered if they meet certain requirements.But that still leaves many children – mostly Roma – without birth certificates for significant periods after birth.

“Our work with international agencies and the government has led to some progress, but Serbian law still allows the authorities to leave newborn children legally invisible. We hope the court agrees with us that this is in breach of Serbia’s constitution”, said Ivanka Kostic, Praxis’s Executive Director.

Praxis and the ERRC are both members of the European Network on Statelessness (ENS), and the two organisations designed this litigation as part of ENS’s three year pan European litigation strategy to end childhood statelessness.

The organisations believe that the way the rule is applied is discriminatory against Roma. These legal proceedings are about whether the rule is compatible with the rights of the child. Every child is entitled to a name and a legal identity from birth. This litigation promises to make this a reality in Serbia for all children.

Download the Initiative here.

3 March

To European Leaders:

As national and international organizations working along the Western Balkan migration route in Greece, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, and Croatia, we strongly condemn the latest discriminatory and dangerous measures adopted by European countries as part of a broader package of deterrence policies intended to stem the flow of vulnerable people seeking safety.

Download: Joint Statement

Signatories: ActionAid, Albanian Helsinki Committee, Atina Serbia, Belgrade Center for Human Rights, Center for Youth Integration Serbia,
Civic Initiatives Belgrade, Civil Rights Program Kosovo, Doctors of the World Greece, European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Građanske inicijative – Civic Initiative, Greek Council of Refugees, Greek Forum of Refugees, Grupa 484, Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Humanitarni centar za integraciju i toleranciju (HCIT), Hrvatski pravni centar, International Rescue Committee, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Macedonian Young Lawyers Association, Norwegian Refugee Council, Open Gate - La Strada, Oxfam, Practical Policy Centre Serbia, Praksis, Praxis Serbia, Save the Children, Solidarity Now, VluchtelingenWerk Nederland

These men from Afghanistan arrived to Belgrade on January 30th, at 1:40 am. Our team met them in the close surroundings of the central bus station. One of the members of the group is a 16-year-old boy, six of them are deaf. Only one person in the group could communicate in English.

Their journey hasn’t been easy at all. They arrived hungry and frozen, after the days of walk. They were beaten and robbed along the way. In other words, they were broke and broken. We immediately provided them with the blankets and meals, but what they needed the most at the moment of our encounter was a warm shelter, a place to sleep over and recover - a safety place, at least for a couple of days.

At almost 2 am, one of the few places that could have offered them such help, free of charge, was Asylum Centre in Krnjaca. However, there’s a catch. In order to get accommodated in Krnjaca, one first needs to be registered and given a certificate stating that he/she is transiting to another country, or in which he/she is expressing an interest in seeking asylum in the Republic of Serbia. Our team immediately took the group to get registered, but earlier that evening the registration system had crashed and no person could be registered throughout the night. In other words, our Afghan friends were told to come back early in the morning. What happens in such cases? If you need a registration certificate to  enter the asylum centre and you cannot obtain it due to the system failure, what is to be done?

Well, what should have been done is that the group should l have been received in the asylum centre, as the centre also provides emergent shelter for those who for some reason cannot immediately register, as in the case of our Afghan group. In such situations, people who have been offered emergent shelter would have to go and register the following day.

But which cases are considered  as really urgent? Is being beaten, frozen and exhausted a good enough case?

In the early morning hours of January 31st, these criteria were not good enough. Ten men were not allowed to enter the asylum centre. It was around 3 am and -4 C. The day to come was still several freezing hours away. We placed the group in a waiting room of the bus station, which became their shelter for the following night.

The morning of January 31st arrived. Sometime before 7 am, our team picked the group up and escorted them to the police station. By the early afternoon, most of the members were successfully registered, and finally got eligible to ask for the assistance of the asylum centre and/or for the continuation of their journey.

We wished them good luck and flawless bureaucratic systems on the way to their final destinations. And in case the system they are about to face fails again, we truly hope that the fellow human beings on their way won’t.

In the meantime, we will continue to advocate and draw attention of the competent institutions to the bad practice in the field and hope that our efforts pay off so that another such group of people actually get the needed and guaranteed assistance.

Praxis means action
Praxis means action
Praxis means action
Praxis means action